Macro Mechanics #3: Bank Reserves & The “Ample” Floor

Macro Mechanics #3: Bank Reserves & The “Ample” Floor

Pierce & Pierce Research | January 2026
Part of the Macro Mechanics Series

⏱️ 12-15 minutes • Beginner-friendly • No prior Fed knowledge required


Connection to Previous Briefs: In Brief #1, we covered the TGA—where government cash sits. In Brief #2, the ON RRP buffer—now exhausted. Bank reserves are where those flows ultimately land. This is the liquidity that actually matters for market plumbing.


Why This Matters

In September 2019, overnight lending rates spiked to 10%. The repo market seized up. Banks that needed to borrow cash for a single day suddenly could not find it at any reasonable price. The Federal Reserve had to intervene with emergency injections of $75 billion per day.

The cause? Bank reserves had fallen too low.

In October 2025, something similar started happening. Usage of the Fed’s Standing Repo Facility spiked to $50 billion. Money market rates drifted higher within the Fed’s target range. The Fed announced the end of quantitative tightening and prepared to restart balance sheet expansion.

Current Reserve Status:

Metric Value Status
Reserve Balance $2.88 trillion 🔴 Below floor
Estimated Floor $2.9-3.0 trillion -
Position vs Floor ~$20-120B below 🔴 Critical

Reserves are now below the estimated floor range. This is why the Fed pivoted to active T-bill purchases in December 2025. The plumbing is under stress.


Section 1: What Are Bank Reserves?

Bank reserves are the cash that commercial banks hold in their accounts at the Federal Reserve. Think of it as the bank’s own checking account at the central bank.

Banks use reserves to settle transactions with each other. When you transfer money from your Chase account to a friend’s Wells Fargo account, the underlying settlement involves Chase’s reserve account sending funds to Wells Fargo’s reserve account at the Fed.

Pre-2008 vs Post-2008:

Era Reserve Level How Fed Controlled Rates
Pre-2008 <$50 billion Adjusted supply daily
Post-2008 (QE) $2-4 trillion Pays interest on reserves

Before 2008, the Fed operated with a small amount of reserves. Banks borrowed and lent reserves constantly in the federal funds market. The Fed controlled rates by adjusting supply.

Then came the financial crisis. The Fed flooded the system with reserves through quantitative easing. Reserve balances exploded from under $50 billion to over $2.8 trillion by 2014.

The key takeaway: Reserves went from scarce (banks needed every dollar) to abundant (banks had more than they could use). The Fed now pays interest on reserves to keep rates where it wants them.


Section 2: The Reserve Framework

The Fed currently operates under an “ample reserves” framework. This sounds simple but contains crucial nuance.

Three Reserve Regimes:

Regime Reserve Level Rate Behaviour Status
🟢 Abundant >$3.2T (well above floor) EFFR at bottom of range Excess liquidity
🟡 Ample $2.9-3.2T (above floor with buffer) EFFR within range Target zone
🔴 Scarce <$2.9T (at or below floor) Rates drift higher, stress signs Current

The Problem:

There is no precise number that defines “ample.” The threshold depends on:

Factor Why It Matters
Reserve distribution Some banks may be short even if aggregate is high
Regulatory requirements LCR, NSFR—Basel III liquidity requirements that force banks to hold minimum reserve buffers—trap some reserves
Bank risk preferences Post-2019, banks hold larger precautionary buffers
Payment system structure Intraday needs vary

Floor Estimates:

Source Estimated Floor Confidence
Fed research $2.7-3.0 trillion Medium
Market consensus $2.8-2.9 trillion Medium
October 2025 stress ~$3.0T (stress emerged) High

The only way to truly discover the floor is to approach it and see what breaks.


Section 3: September 2019 - What Happens When Reserves Are Scarce

The clearest illustration of reserve scarcity came on September 16-17, 2019.

The Setup:

Factor Condition
Reserves Declined to ~$1.4 trillion (lowest since 2011)
What drained them QT1 balance sheet runoff since Oct 2017
Trigger events Corporate tax payments + Treasury settlement

What Happened:

Date Repo Rate Fed Target Range Status
Sept 15 ~2.0% 2.00-2.25% 🟢 Normal
Sept 16 5.0% 2.00-2.25% 🔴 Stress
Sept 17 10.0% (intraday) 2.00-2.25% 🔴 Crisis
Post-intervention ~2.1% 2.00-2.25% 🟢 Resolved

The federal funds rate itself moved above the target range. This represented a loss of monetary policy control. Banks could not access reserves at reasonable prices.

The Fed’s Response:

Action Amount Timeline
Emergency repo injection $75 billion/day Sept 17 onwards
Continued injections Daily Months
T-bill purchases Announced Oct 2019 Ongoing

The Lesson:

Reserves at $1.4 trillion were too low. The system could not handle even normal seasonal pressures. The Fed had overshot on QT and had to reverse course.


Section 4: October 2025 - Warning Signs Return

Fast forward to October 2025. Reserves had declined from post-pandemic peaks above $4 trillion to approximately $3.0 trillion through three years of QT2.

The Warning Indicators:

Indicator Normal October 2025 Status
EFFR position Lower half of range Drifting higher 🟡 Warning
SRF usage Near zero $50 billion spike 🔴 Stress signal
Money market volatility Low Elevated 🟡 Warning

Comparison: 2019 vs 2025:

Factor September 2019 October 2025
Reserves ~$1.4T ~$3.0T
Preceding action QT1 drainage QT2 drainage
Warning signal Repo rate spike SRF usage spike
Fed response T-bill purchases End QT + T-bill purchases
Severity 🔴 Market seized 🟡 Contained stress

The Fed’s Response:

Date Action Effect
Oct 2025 Announced end of QT (effective Dec 1) Stopped drainage
Dec 10, 2025 Announced T-bill purchases ($40B/month) Started injection
Dec 12, 2025 Purchases begin Active reserve management

The Fed learned from 2019. Rather than waiting for markets to break, it acted preemptively when warning signs appeared.


Section 5: The “Ample” Floor Estimates

How low can reserves go before stress emerges?

Official Guidance:

Fed Chair Powell and other officials have described the target as maintaining reserves “somewhat above” the level where scarcity pressures emerge. They explicitly avoid naming a specific number.

Why the Uncertainty:

Factor Complication
Distribution Aggregate can be high while some banks face scarcity
Regulation LCR, NSFR, RLAP requirements trap reserves
Behaviour change Post-2019 banks hold larger precautionary buffers
Intraday needs Payment timing creates peaks and troughs

Current Assessment:

Metric Value Status
Current reserves $2.88T 🔴
Distance to low estimate +$180B above $2.7T 🟡
Distance to high estimate -$20B below $2.9T 🔴

November 2025 data now confirms reserves have fallen below the $2.9T floor estimate. The October 2025 stress at roughly $3.0 trillion was an early warning. The Fed’s pivot to T-bill purchases was timely.


Section 6: Where We Are Now

Current Reserve Dashboard (January 2026):

Metric Level Status
Bank Reserves (TOTRESNS) $2.88 trillion 🔴 Below floor
Fed Target Range 3.50% - 3.75% -
IORB Rate 3.65% Interest paid on reserves
EFFR ~3.58% 🟢 Within target range
SRF Usage Low 🟢 Fed managing actively

Reserve Trajectory:

Date Reserves Driver
Jan 2022 ~$4.0T Post-QE peak
Jan 2023 ~$3.5T QT drainage
Jan 2024 ~$3.3T Continued drainage
Oct 2025 ~$2.94T SRF stress emerged
Nov 2025 ~$2.88T Below floor, QT ended
Jan 2026 ~$2.88T Fed T-bill purchases ongoing

Projection (Fed operations only, assumes TGA neutral):

Date Expected Reserves Status
Jan 2026 ~$2.88T 🔴 Below floor
Mar 2026 ~$2.96-3.00T 🟡 Approaching floor
Jun 2026 ~$3.08-3.12T 🟢 Rebuilding buffer

Note: This projection isolates Fed T-bill purchases (~$40B/month) and doesn’t account for TGA movements or other balance sheet dynamics which could accelerate or offset these flows.

The Fed has indicated that initial T-bill purchases will be “elevated” through April 2026 and then reduced. The urgency is real—reserves are below floor.


Section 7: Thesis Connection

For Pierce & Pierce readers, reserve levels provide the fundamental constraint on the liquidity thesis.

Why Reserves Matter for Risk Assets:

Reserve Condition Effect on Markets
🟢 Abundant Banks have excess liquidity to deploy. Funding cheap and available. Supports risk-taking.
🟡 Ample Normal functioning. Adequate for system needs.
🔴 Scarce Banks hoard liquidity. Credit tightens. Market-making suffers. Risk appetite declines.

Combined Injection Channels:

Source Monthly Impact Status
Fed T-bill purchases +$40B 🟢 Ongoing since Dec 12
TGA drawdown (variable) +$40B 🟢 Ongoing
ON RRP buffer $0 (exhausted) 🔴 No absorption
Net to reserves ~$80B 🟢 Direct injection

⚠️ Transmission Caveats:

More reserves do not automatically mean higher asset prices. The relationship requires several transmission steps:

Factor Why Transmission Can Break
Bank deployment Reserves must be deployed, not hoarded
Basel III constraints LCR, NSFR can trap reserves
Credit demand Must exist for reserves to become loans
Investor sentiment Risk appetite must support allocation to crypto

But the structural setup is supportive: multiple injection channels, no absorption buffer, reserves below floor with Fed actively managing to rebuild.


Section 8: What To Watch

Primary Data Sources:

Source What It Shows Frequency
FRED: WRESBAL Reserve balances Weekly (Thursdays)
NY Fed SRF Data Standing Repo usage Daily
FRED: EFFR Fed funds rate Daily
FRED: SOFR Repo market rate Daily

Reserve Level Interpretation:

Level Status Interpretation
>$3.2T 🟢 Comfortable buffer above floor
$2.9-3.2T 🟡 Near floor, requires active management
$2.7-2.9T 🔴 At floor, stress likely without Fed support
<$2.7T 🔴 Below floor, money market stress expected

Warning Signs to Monitor:

Indicator Normal Warning Level Current Status
SRF usage Near zero >$20B sustained 🟢 Normal
EFFR position Lower half of range At/above top 🟢 Normal
Repo rate vs IORB Below IORB Spikes above 🟢 Normal

The Reserve Pressure Formula:

Reserve Pressure = EFFR - (Bottom of target range)

Current: 3.58% - 3.50% = +8 bps → Ample, no stress
EFFR Position Interpretation Status
Near bottom of range Reserves abundant 🟢
Middle of range Reserves ample 🟡
Near/above top of range Reserves tightening 🔴

Quick Reference

Item Detail
The Mechanic Reserves are cash banks hold at the Fed. Too few reserves and money markets seize up (September 2019). The Fed targets “ample” reserves to maintain rate control.
The Nuance No magic number for “ample.” Distribution matters as much as aggregate level. Banks can be reserve-constrained even when system-wide levels look adequate.
Current Level $2.93 trillion (December 10, 2025)
Estimated Floor $2.7-2.9 trillion (significant uncertainty)
Buffer Status 🟡 Minimal. Reserves near the floor with Fed actively injecting.
Recent Stress October 2025 SRF spike at ~$3.0T reserves prompted Fed to end QT and begin purchases.
Transmission Reserve abundance supports but does not guarantee risk asset appreciation.
Monitor FRED series WRESBAL (weekly), NY Fed SRF usage (daily), EFFR position in target range

What’s Next

Brief #4: QT → QE (Balance Sheet Cycles)
How Fed balance sheet policy actually works, what changed in December 2025, and why “reserve management purchases” are different from QE.

Brief #5: Global M2 & The Liquidity Lag
Why Bitcoin correlates with money supply, why the lag typically runs 70-90 days, and what the current divergence tells us.


Sources:
Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) | NY Fed Open Market Operations | FOMC Meeting Minutes and Statements | Federal Reserve Staff Working Papers | Brookings Institution Repo Market Analysis | Office of Financial Research | NY Fed Liberty Street Economics

Methodology Note:
Reserve data from FRED series WRESBAL through December 10, 2025. September 2019 analysis from Federal Reserve staff notes and NY Fed research. October 2025 analysis from FOMC statements and Fed operations data. All figures represent publicly available data from official sources.


This publication is for educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry substantial risk of complete loss.

Pierce & Pierce Research
Democratising Institutional-Grade Crypto Research

Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman

I run the Pierce & Pierce research desk. Institutional grade analysis, stripped of noise. Sharp suits, sharper research.
New York