Macro Mechanics #4: QT → QE (Balance Sheet Cycles)

Macro Mechanics #4: QT → QE (Balance Sheet Cycles)

Pierce & Pierce Research | January 2026
Part of the Macro Mechanics Series

⏱️ 14-16 minutes • Beginner-friendly • No prior Fed knowledge required


Story So Far: We’ve now covered the three components that determine domestic liquidity: the TGA (government’s cash), the ON RRP (the buffer), and bank reserves (the liquidity that matters). Fed balance sheet policy—QT and QE—is the force that moves all three simultaneously.


Why This Matters

On December 1, 2025, the Federal Reserve ended quantitative tightening. For 42 months, the Fed had systematically drained liquidity from the financial system by letting bonds mature without replacement.

On December 10, 2025, the Fed announced it would begin purchasing Treasury bills at a pace of $40 billion per month.

The Pivot:

Metric Before Dec 2025 After Dec 2025 Change
Balance sheet direction Shrinking ~$60B/month Growing ~$40B/month 🟢 +$100B/month swing
Reserve impact Draining Adding 🟢 Headwind → Tailwind
Policy stance Tightening Easing (technical) 🟢

But the details matter. This is not the same as the massive QE programs that followed the 2008 financial crisis or the 2020 pandemic. The Fed is buying short-term bills, not longer-dated bonds. The stated purpose is “reserve management,” not economic stimulus.


Section 1: What Is Quantitative Easing?

Quantitative easing is when the Federal Reserve creates money to buy securities from the private sector.

The QE Process:

Step What Happens
1 Fed decides to purchase Treasury bonds or MBS
2 Contacts dealers who sell securities to the Fed
3 Fed pays by crediting dealers’ bank reserve accounts
4 Dealers’ banks now have more reserves
5 Fed owns the securities
Result 🟢 New money enters the banking system

Why QE Matters—The Portfolio Rebalancing Effect:

When the Fed buys bonds from institutional investors, those investors receive cash they need to redeploy. If bond yields are low, they may reach for yield in equities, credit, or alternative assets including crypto. This portfolio rebalancing effect was a major driver of 2020-2021 risk asset rallies.

Historical QE Programmes:

Programme Period Balance Sheet Addition
QE1 2008-2010 ~$1.7 trillion
QE2 2010-2011 ~$600 billion
QE3 2012-2014 ~$1.6 trillion
COVID QE 2020-2022 ~$4.8 trillion

Section 2: What Is Quantitative Tightening?

Quantitative tightening is the reverse of QE. The Fed lets securities mature without replacement and shrinks the balance sheet.

The QT Process:

Step What Happens
1 Treasury bonds or MBS that the Fed owns reach maturity
2 Treasury repays the principal to the Fed
3 Fed lets the cash disappear (doesn’t reinvest)
4 Balance sheet shrinks
Result 🔴 Reserves decline, liquidity tightens

QT Comparison:

Cycle Period Duration Drainage How It Ended
QT1 Oct 2017 - Sept 2019 24 months ~$700B 🔴 Repo crisis, emergency stop
QT2 June 2022 - Nov 2025 42 months ~$2.5T 🟡 Preemptive stop on stress signals

QT2 Pace:

Period Monthly Cap Components
June 2022 - May 2025 $95B $60B Treasuries + $35B MBS
June 2025 - Nov 2025 $60B $25B Treasuries + $35B MBS
Dec 2025 onwards $0 QT ended

Section 3: The December 2025 Pivot

Timeline of Events:

Date Action Significance
Oct 2025 SRF usage spiked to $50B 🔴 Warning signal
Oct 30, 2025 FOMC announces QT ending Dec 1 Stopped drainage
Dec 1, 2025 QT officially ends 42 months of tightening complete
Dec 10, 2025 Fed announces T-bill purchases ($40B/month) Active injection begins
Dec 12, 2025 First purchases Balance sheet starts expanding

What Changed:

Factor QT Period Post-December
Balance sheet size Shrinking Growing
Monthly flow -$60B +$40B
Reserve impact Draining Adding
Fed stance Passive drainage Active management
Status 🔴 Headwind 🟢 Tailwind

The Trigger:

The Fed acted on warning signs, not a crisis.

Indicator September 2019 October 2025
Repo rates Spiked to 10% Elevated but contained
SRF usage N/A (didn’t exist) $50B spike
Fed response Emergency intervention Preemptive policy shift
Outcome 🔴 Market broke 🟡 Stress contained

Section 4: Reserve Management vs. QE

The Fed has been emphatic that its new T-bill purchases are not QE. The distinction matters.

Three Key Differences:

Factor QE Reserve Management Purchases
Duration Long-dated (10-30 year bonds) Short-dated (T-bills, <1 year)
Intent Economic stimulus Technical reserve maintenance
Scale $80-120B/month $40B/month

Detailed Comparison:

Aspect Pandemic QE (2020-2022) Current Purchases
Monthly pace ~$120B at peak ~$40B
Securities type Treasuries + MBS across curve T-bills only
Stated purpose Stimulate economy, support markets Maintain ample reserves
Effect on mortgage rates 🟢 Directly lowered 🟡 Minimal
Effect on reserves 🟢 Massive expansion 🟢 Modest expansion

What This Means:

Aspect Assessment
Reserve injection 🟢 Yes, supports liquidity
Long-term rate suppression 🔴 No, not like QE
Economic stimulus 🟡 Limited, technical purpose
Risk asset support 🟢 Yes, but less powerful than QE

For crypto and risk assets, the reserve injection is what matters most. Whether the Fed calls it QE or reserve management, dollars flowing into the banking system create liquidity that can eventually find its way to riskier assets.

But temper expectations. This is not the moonshot liquidity that drove the 2020-2021 rally. It is maintenance-level support.


Section 5: Historical Balance Sheet Cycles

Fed Balance Sheet History:

Era Period Balance Sheet What Happened
Pre-crisis Before 2008 <$1T Traditional monetary policy
QE Era 2008-2014 $1T → $4.5T Financial crisis response
Normalization 2015-2019 $4.5T → $3.8T Rate hikes + QT1
COVID QE 2020-2022 $4.2T → $9.0T Pandemic response
QT2 2022-2025 $9.0T → $6.5T Inflation fighting
Current Dec 2025+ $6.5T → ? Reserve management

QT Cycle Comparison:

Factor QT1 (2017-2019) QT2 (2022-2025)
Starting balance sheet $4.5T $9.0T
Ending balance sheet $3.8T $6.5T
Duration 24 months 42 months
Total drained ~$700B ~$2.5T
How it ended 🔴 Repo crisis 🟡 Preemptive stop
Lesson learned Don’t wait for markets to break Act on warning signs

Balance Sheet as % of GDP:

Date Balance Sheet % of GDP
2007 ~$900B ~6%
2014 (QE peak) ~$4.5T ~25%
2019 (QT1 end) ~$3.8T ~18%
2022 (COVID peak) ~$9.0T ~36%
Dec 2025 ~$6.5T ~24%*

*Based on estimated 2025 GDP of ~$27T (annualized)


Section 6: Where We Are Now

Current Balance Sheet (January 2026):

Component Level Change from Peak
Total Assets $6.64 trillion -26% from April 2022
Treasury Securities $4.25 trillion -$1.5T from peak
MBS $2.03 trillion -$0.7T from peak
T-Bills $235 billion 🟢 Growing with purchases

December 2025 was notable: The balance sheet grew by approximately $105 billion in December—the largest single-month expansion since QE ended. Fed T-bill purchases are working.

Composition Shift:

Component Direction What It Means
MBS ↓ Continuing to roll off Mortgage payoffs reduce holdings
T-bills ↑ Growing Fed purchasing short-term
Net effect Shorter duration portfolio More flexibility for future policy

Monthly Flow Projection:

Factor Monthly Impact Direction
T-bill purchases +$40B 🟢 Expanding
MBS runoff -$15-20B 🔴 Contracting
Net effect +$20-25B 🟢 Slight expansion

Reserve Trajectory:

Month Projected Reserves Status
Jan 2026 ~$2.88T (current) 🔴 Below floor
Mar 2026 ~$2.96-3.00T 🟡 Approaching floor
Jun 2026 ~$3.08-3.12T 🟢 Rebuilding buffer
Dec 2026 ~$3.25-3.35T 🟢 Well above floor

Note: Projections isolate Fed operations and assume TGA neutrality. Actual trajectory will reflect TGA movements and other factors.


Section 7: Thesis Connection

The Fed’s balance sheet pivot provides crucial context for the Pierce & Pierce liquidity thesis.

From Headwind to Tailwind:

Period Balance Sheet Flow Effect on Liquidity
June 2022 - Nov 2025 -$60B/month 🔴 42-month headwind
Dec 2025 onwards +$40B/month 🟢 New tailwind
Swing $100B/month Significant shift

Combined Liquidity Channels:

Channel Monthly Flow Status
Fed T-bill purchases +$40B 🟢 Ongoing
TGA drawdown (variable) +$40B 🟢 Ongoing
MBS runoff -$15B 🔴 Continuing
ON RRP release ~$0 🔴 Exhausted
Net injection ~$65B 🟢 Multiple channels positive

Important Distinctions:

Factor Past Liquidity Rallies Current Setup
Fed intent Economic stimulus Technical plumbing
Purchase type Long-dated bonds Short-dated bills
Pace $120B/month $40B/month
Yield impact Lowered long-term rates Minimal
Status 🟢 Explosive 🟡 Supportive

⚠️ Transmission Caveats:

Factor Risk
Bank deployment Reserves may be hoarded, not deployed
Regulatory constraints LCR, NSFR trap some reserves
Credit demand Must exist for reserves to stimulate
Risk appetite Macro concerns can override liquidity support
Fed commitment Purchases could slow if conditions change

The balance sheet shift provides structural support for liquidity conditions. It does not guarantee asset price appreciation.

What Would Change the Trajectory:

Risk Likelihood Potential Impact
Inflation resurgence Medium-High* Could halt purchases
Financial stability event Low Could accelerate purchases
Political pressure Low-Medium Uncertain direction
TGA dynamics Medium Could require adjustment

*The December 2025 FOMC revised core PCE projections higher and signaled fewer cuts expected in 2026, indicating heightened inflation sensitivity.


Section 8: What To Watch

Primary Data Sources:

Source What It Shows Frequency
FRED: WALCL Total Fed balance sheet Weekly (Thursdays)
FRED: TREAST Treasury holdings Weekly
FRED: WSHOMCB MBS holdings Weekly
NY Fed SOMA Holdings Detailed breakdown Weekly

Balance Sheet Interpretation:

Level Status Interpretation
>$6.6T 🟢 Growing, supportive
$6.4-6.6T 🟡 Stable, neutral
<$6.4T 🔴 Shrinking, headwind (should not occur)

Growth Rate Calculation:

Monthly BS Change = Current WALCL - WALCL 4 weeks ago
Result Status Interpretation
Positive 🟢 Balance sheet expanding
Near zero 🟡 Maintenance mode
Negative 🔴 Unexpected drainage

Quick Reference

Item Detail
The Mechanic QE expands balance sheet by purchasing securities, creating reserves. QT shrinks it by letting securities mature, draining reserves.
The Nuance Reserve management purchases are different from QE. They target bills not bonds, aim for technical reserve levels not stimulus, operate at fraction of QE’s scale.
QT2 Stats June 2022 to November 2025. 42 months. ~$2.5 trillion drained.
Current Status Balance sheet at $6.54 trillion. QT ended Dec 1. T-bill purchases began Dec 12 at $40B/month.
Trajectory 🟢 Slight expansion (~$20-25B/month net) targeting reserve maintenance
Transmission Reserve injections support liquidity but do not guarantee asset price gains
Monitor FRED series WALCL (weekly), TREAST (Treasury holdings), NY Fed SOMA data

What’s Next

Brief #5: Global M2 & The Liquidity Lag
Why Bitcoin correlates with money supply, why global M2 matters more than US M2 alone, and why the lag typically runs 70-90 days.


Sources:
Federal Reserve Economic Data (FRED) | FOMC Meeting Statements and Minutes | NY Fed Open Market Operations | Federal Reserve Balance Sheet Reports | Fed Staff Working Papers on QE Transmission | Brookings Institution Monetary Policy Analysis

Methodology Note:
Balance sheet data from FRED series WALCL, TREAST, and WSHOMCB through December 2025. Historical QE/QT analysis from Fed research publications. December 2025 policy details from FOMC statements and NY Fed operating policy announcements. All figures represent publicly available data from official sources.


This publication is for educational purposes only. Not financial advice. Cryptocurrency investments carry substantial risk of complete loss.

Pierce & Pierce Research
Democratising Institutional-Grade Crypto Research

Patrick Bateman

Patrick Bateman

I run the Pierce & Pierce research desk. Institutional grade analysis, stripped of noise. Sharp suits, sharper research.
New York